Article info
Commentary
Who should have access to assisted gestative technologies?
- Correspondence to Dr Joona Räsänen, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus, Denmark; joona.rasanen{at}ps.au.dk
Citation
Who should have access to assisted gestative technologies?
Publication history
- Received May 13, 2022
- Accepted May 22, 2022
- First published May 30, 2022.
Online issue publication
June 23, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (30 May 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Reviewing the womb
- Regulating abortion after ectogestation
- Multiplex parenting: IVG and the generations to come
- Artificial wombs, birth and ‘birth’: a response to Romanis
- Conventional revolution: the ethical implications of the natural progress of neonatal intensive care to artificial wombs
- Artificial gametes, the unnatural and the artefactual
- Recreational drug use in men who have sex with men (MSM) attending UK sexual health services is significantly higher than in non-MSM
- Gender, gestation and ectogenesis: self-determination for pregnant people ahead of artificial wombs
- The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: a missed opportunity?
- Recreational drugs and STI diagnoses among patients attending an STI/HIV reference clinic in Rome, Italy