Article Text
Ethics briefing
Ethics briefing
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Shifting abortion care from a hospital to a community sexual and reproductive health care setting
- Human rights versus societal norms: a mixed methods study among healthcare providers on social stigma related to adolescent abortion and contraceptive use in Kisumu, Kenya
- Abortion care services delivered from a community sexual and reproductive health setting: views of health care professionals
- Comparison of uptake of long-acting reversible contraception after abortion from a hospital or a community sexual and reproductive healthcare setting: an observational study
- Inclusion of abortion-related care in national health benefit packages: results from a WHO global survey
- Abortion care: ensuring excellence, promoting wellbeing and improving training
- Multicountry research on comprehensive abortion policy implementation in Latin America: a mixed-methods study protocol
- Why a good law is not always good enough: a global review of restrictions to supportive laws for sexual and reproductive health and rights
- UTAH: Using Telemedicine to improve early medical Abortion at Home: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing face-to-face with telephone consultations for women seeking early medical abortion
- Estimating the incidence of abortion: using the Abortion Incidence Complications Methodology in Ghana, 2017