Article info
PDFResponse
Abortion and the veil of ignorance: a response to Minehan
- Correspondence to Mr Joona Räsänen, Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Oslo 0315, Norway; joona.rasanen{at}ifikk.uio.no
Citation
Abortion and the veil of ignorance: a response to Minehan
Publication history
- Received May 20, 2021
- Accepted May 30, 2021
- First published June 25, 2021.
Online issue publication
November 15, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 November 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Moral status of the fetus and the permissibility of abortion: a contractarian response to Thomson’s violinist thought experiment
- Herpes genitalis and the philosopher's stance
- How to depolarise the ethical debate over human embryonic stem cell research (and other ethical debates too!)
- Ethics of using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to select a stem cell donor for an existing person
- Human embryonic stem cells and respect for life
- Ethical and legal aspects of stem cell practices in Turkey: where are we?
- Benefits, risks and ethical considerations in translation of stem cell research to clinical applications in Parkinson’s disease
- Stem cell research on other worlds, or why embryos do not have a right to life
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- Against tiebreaking arguments in priority setting