In a recent JME paper, Matthew John Minehan applies John Rawls’ veil of ignorance against Judith Thomson’s famous violinist argument for the permissibility of abortion. Minehan asks readers to ‘imagine that one morning you are back to back in bed with another person. One of you is conscious and the other unconscious. You do not know which one you are’. Since from this position of ignorance, you have an equal chance of being the unconscious violinist and the conscious person attached to him, it would be rational to oppose a right for detachment. Likewise, behind the veil of ignorance, it is rational to oppose abortions since you could be the fetus, Minehan claims. This paper provides a plausible reply to this argument.
- abortion - induced
- reproductive medicine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors JR is the sole author of this work.
Funding UiO Life Science Convergence Project: Epigenetics and bioethics of human embryonic development.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Moral status of the fetus and the permissibility of abortion: a contractarian response to Thomson’s violinist thought experiment
- Herpes genitalis and the philosopher's stance
- How to depolarise the ethical debate over human embryonic stem cell research (and other ethical debates too!)
- Ethics of using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to select a stem cell donor for an existing person
- Human embryonic stem cells and respect for life
- Ethical and legal aspects of stem cell practices in Turkey: where are we?
- Benefits, risks and ethical considerations in translation of stem cell research to clinical applications in Parkinson’s disease
- Stem cell research on other worlds, or why embryos do not have a right to life
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- Ethics of split liver transplantation: should a large liver always be split if medically safe?