The unnaturalistic fallacy: COVID-19 vaccine mandates should not discriminate against natural immunity
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- The unnaturalistic fallacy: COVID-19 vaccine mandates should not discriminate against natural immunity
Other content recommended for you
- Proportionality, wrongs and equipoise for natural immunity exemptions: response to commentators
- Who commits the unnaturalistic fallacy?
- The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good
- Vaccination against COVID-19 and society’s return to normality in England: a modelling study of impacts of different types of naturally acquired and vaccine-induced immunity
- Wrong question and the wrong standard of proof
- Vaccinating people who have had covid-19: why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US?
- Vaccine mandates for healthcare workers beyond COVID-19
- Ethics of genomic passports: should the genetically resistant be exempted from lockdowns and quarantines?
- Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with variations in antibody response to BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare workers at an academic medical centre: a longitudinal cohort analysis
- COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities