Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
Is the international regulation of medical complicity with torture largely window dressing? The case of Israel and the lessons of a 12-year medical ethical appeal
- Correspondence to Dr Derek Summerfield, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London SE5 8BB, UK; derek.summerfield{at}googlemail.com
Citation
Is the international regulation of medical complicity with torture largely window dressing? The case of Israel and the lessons of a 12-year medical ethical appeal
Publication history
- Received February 17, 2021
- Accepted May 26, 2021
- First published June 15, 2021.
Online issue publication
November 15, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 November 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Medical ethics, the Israeli Medical Association, and the state of the World Medical Association
- The Israeli Medical Association and doctors’ complicity in torture
- Doctors call for head of World Medical Association to quit as “matter of priority”
- The campaign about doctors and torture in Israel two years on
- Group of British doctors call for a boycott of the Israel Medical Association
- Doctors in Israeli detention facilities are complicit in torture, says report
- Medical ethics, the Israeli Medical Association, and the state of the World Medical Association
- Support the opposition to force feeding of hunger strikers in Israel
- Helping to stop doctors becoming complicit in torture
- Time for WMA to take action