Article Text
Commentary
Commentary on ‘Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor’
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Response to commentaries: ‘autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor’
- Patient preference predictors and the problem of naked statistical evidence
- Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients
- A new method for making treatment decisions for incapacitated patients: what do patients think about the use of a patient preference predictor?
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making
- Practising what we preach: clinical ethicists’ professional perspectives and personal use of advance directives