Article info
Commentary
Sovereignty, authenticity and the patient preference predictor
- Correspondence to Ben Schwan, Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; ben.schwan{at}case.edu
Citation
Sovereignty, authenticity and the patient preference predictor
Publication history
- Received March 25, 2022
- Accepted April 11, 2022
- First published April 25, 2022.
Online issue publication
April 25, 2022
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Ditching decision-making capacity
- Response to commentaries: ‘autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor’
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Fostering relational autonomy in end-of-life care: a procedural approach and three-dimensional decision-making model
- Temporising and respect for patient self-determination
- Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives
- Autonomy and negatively informed consent
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Trial by Triad: substituted judgment, mental illness and the right to die