Article info
PDFConcise argument
Meta-surrogate decision making and artificial intelligence
- Correspondence to Dr Brian D Earp, Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England; brian.earp{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Meta-surrogate decision making and artificial intelligence
Publication history
- First published April 25, 2022.
Online issue publication
April 26, 2022
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Minority report: can minor parents refuse treatment for their child?
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Settling for second best: when should doctors agree to parental demands for suboptimal medical treatment?
- Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making
- As low as reasonably practicable (ALARP): a moral model for clinical risk management in the setting of technology dependence
- Medically assisted gender affirmation: when children and parents disagree
- The limits of parental responsibility regarding medical treatment decisions
- Worth living or worth dying? The views of the general public about allowing disabled children to die
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- The child's right to an open future: is the principle applicable to non-therapeutic circumcision?