Article info
PDFCommentary
Are physicians requesting a second opinion really engaging in a reason-giving dialectic? Normative questions on the standards for second opinions and AI
- Correspondence to Dr Benjamin H Lang, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Benjamin.Lang{at}bcm.edu
Citation
Are physicians requesting a second opinion really engaging in a reason-giving dialectic? Normative questions on the standards for second opinions and AI
Publication history
- Received March 1, 2022
- Accepted March 3, 2022
- First published March 23, 2022.
Online issue publication
May 04, 2022
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement: ethical and epistemological challenges of using AI in clinical diagnostic contexts
- Agree to disagree: the symmetry of burden of proof in human–AI collaboration
- Second opinion programmes in Germany: a mixed-methods study protocol
- AI decision-support: a dystopian future of machine paternalism?
- Patient-initiated second medical consultations—patient characteristics and motivating factors, impact on care and satisfaction: a systematic review
- Second opinion utilization by healthcare insurance type in a mixed private-public healthcare system: a population-based study
- Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies
- AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care
- Responsibility and decision-making authority in using clinical decision support systems: an empirical-ethical exploration of German prospective professionals’ preferences and concerns
- The value of personalised risk information: a qualitative study of the perceptions of patients with prostate cancer