Article info
PDFCommentary
Agree to disagree: the symmetry of burden of proof in human–AI collaboration
- Correspondence to Dr Karin Rolanda Jongsma, Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3508 GA, Netherlands; K.R.Jongsma{at}umcutrecht.nl
Citation
Agree to disagree: the symmetry of burden of proof in human–AI collaboration
Publication history
- Received February 28, 2022
- Accepted March 3, 2022
- First published March 23, 2022.
Online issue publication
May 04, 2022
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement: ethical and epistemological challenges of using AI in clinical diagnostic contexts
- Are physicians requesting a second opinion really engaging in a reason-giving dialectic? Normative questions on the standards for second opinions and AI
- Second opinion programmes in Germany: a mixed-methods study protocol
- Second opinion utilization by healthcare insurance type in a mixed private-public healthcare system: a population-based study
- Getting rights right: implementing ‘Martha’s Rule’
- Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies
- Patient-initiated second medical consultations—patient characteristics and motivating factors, impact on care and satisfaction: a systematic review
- AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care
- How do patients respond to safety problems in ambulatory care? Results of a retrospective cross-sectional telephone survey
- Second opinion and time to knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study of 142 patients