Responses
Response
LGBT testimony and the limits of trust
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 1 March 2022
- Published on: 1 March 2022Paediatric Patient Preference Absolutism?
Even when there is no reason to doubt the truth of what patients say, it does not necessarily follow that clinicians must do exactly what patients want despite the risks. Is Priest’s line of thought here, in part at least, analogous to that of Minerva (1) and therefore open to a similar critique as that of Saad (2) who coined the term Patient Preference Absolutism to describe such a position?
1. Minerva F. Cosmetic surgery and conscientious objection. Journal of Medical Ethics 2017;44:230- 233.
2. Saad T C Mistakes and missed opportunities regarding cosmetic surgery and conscientious objection Journal of Medical Ethics 2018;44:649-650Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Forever young? The ethics of ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults
- Comfortable in their bodies: the rise of transgender care
- Empowering healthcare professionals with health promotion information for transgender adolescents
- Conversion therapies and access to transition-related healthcare in transgender people: a narrative systematic review
- Safeguarding LGBT+ adolescents
- Discrimination as a predictor of poor mental health among LGBTQ+ people during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional analysis of the online Queerantine study
- Gender in healthcare: a practical approach
- What are the health outcomes of trans and gender diverse young people in Australia? Study protocol for the Trans20 longitudinal cohort study
- “It’s probably an STI because you’re gay”: a qualitative study of diagnostic error experiences in sexual and gender minority individuals
- Detransition needs further understanding, not controversy