Article info
PDFResponse
Twin pregnancy reduction is not an ‘all or nothing’ problem: a response to Räsänen
- Correspondence to Dunja Begović, Law, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; dunja.begovic{at}manchester.ac.uk
Citation
Twin pregnancy reduction is not an ‘all or nothing’ problem: a response to Räsänen
Publication history
- Received February 28, 2021
- Accepted May 14, 2021
- First published June 28, 2021.
Online issue publication
January 21, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (21 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Antenatal care for twin and triplet pregnancies: summary of NICE guidance
- Trends in the incidence and mortality of multiple births by socioeconomic deprivation and maternal age in England: population-based cohort study
- Ethics of fetal reduction: a reply to my critics
- Increased risk of congenital heart disease in twins in the North of England between 1998 and 2010
- IVF twins: buy one get one free?
- Influence of twin-twin transfusion syndrome on fetal cardiovascular structure and function: prospective case–control study of 136 monochorionic twin pregnancies
- Twin pregnancy, fetal reduction and the 'all or nothing problem’
- When diamniotic twins suddenly become monoamniotic twins: spontaneous septostomy of the dividing membrane
- Pathology of twin placentas with special attention to monochorionic twin placentas
- Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials