There have been calls for mandatory vaccination legislation to be introduced into the UK in order to tackle the national and international rise of vaccine-preventable disease. While some countries have had some success associated with mandatory vaccination programmes, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) insist this is not a suitable option for the UK, a country which has seen historical opposition to vaccine mandates. There is a lack of comprehensive data to demonstrate a direct link between mandatory vaccination legislation and increased uptake. While there are examples whereby there has been an improvement, some studies suggest that comparable results can be obtained by strongly recommending vaccinations instead. The RCPCH insist that healthcare workers are ideally placed to engage and inform parents to make every interaction a ‘vaccine opportunity’. This paper calls for a principled, rational approach to interpretations of autonomy which underpin parental informed consent. MacLean’s concept of mutual persuasion could be a vehicle to ensuring parents are suitably informed of both the material risks associated with vaccine choices and to consider the rationality of their decisions, while ultimately upholding parental autonomy. It is argued that this, alongside infrastructural improvement, could create a more sustainable, long-term improvement in childhood vaccination rates in the UK than mandatory vaccination.
- public policy
- bills, laws and cases
- legal philosophy
Data availability statement
Data are available in a public, open access repository.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?
- From compulsory to voluntary immunisation: Italy’s National Vaccination Plan (2005–7) and the ethical and organisational challenges facing public health policy-makers across Europe
- Spoonful of honey or a gallon of vinegar? A conditional COVID-19 vaccination policy for front-line healthcare workers
- ‘This House believes that we have gone too far in granting young people the responsibility for making decisions about their own healthcare’: record of a debate held in the Ethics and Law session of the RCPCH Annual Meeting, York 2009
- Consent and capacity in children and young people
- Better to hesitate at the threshold of compulsion: PKU testing and the concept of family autonomy in Eire
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- A child born with Edward's syndrome: the legal and moral duty to accede to the request for parentage determination