Article info
PDFOriginal research
Twin pregnancy, fetal reduction and the 'all or nothing problem’
- Correspondence to Mr Joona Räsänen, Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Oslo 0315, Norway; joona.rasanen{at}ifikk.uio.no
Citation
Twin pregnancy, fetal reduction and the 'all or nothing problem’
Publication history
- Received September 22, 2020
- Revised October 29, 2020
- Accepted November 8, 2020
- First published December 21, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 21, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (21 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Twin pregnancy reduction is not an ‘all or nothing’ problem: a response to Räsänen
- Fetal reduction, moral permissibility and the all or nothing problem
- Prevalence and risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension in twin pregnancies: a population-based register study
- Effects of antenatal corticosteroids on neonatal outcomes in twin and singleton pregnancies: a Korean national cohort study
- Ethics of fetal reduction: a reply to my critics
- Antenatal care for twin and triplet pregnancies: summary of NICE guidance
- Analysis of the characteristics of blood lipid metabolism in twin pregnancy
- Uterine distention as a factor in birth timing: retrospective nationwide cohort study in Sweden
- Increased risk of congenital heart disease in twins in the North of England between 1998 and 2010
- Trends in the incidence and mortality of multiple births by socioeconomic deprivation and maternal age in England: population-based cohort study