Article info
PDFCommentary
Relevance of a normative framework for evaluating the impact of clinical ethics support services in healthcare
- Correspondence to Dr Jan Schildmann, Institute of History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Sciences, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany; jan.schildmann{at}medizin.uni-halle.de
Citation
Relevance of a normative framework for evaluating the impact of clinical ethics support services in healthcare
Publication history
- Received October 31, 2022
- Accepted November 3, 2022
- First published November 28, 2022.
Online issue publication
January 18, 2024
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement
- Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation
- Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals’ priorities
- Culture, normativity and morisprudence: a response to the commentaries
- Materialising and fostering organisational morisprudence through ethics support tools
- Training healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators: evaluation of a Dutch training programme
- Towards organisational quality in ethics through patterns and process
- Moral case deliberation
- Measuring the impact of clinical ethics support services: further points for consideration
- Need for ethics support in healthcare institutions: views of Dutch board members and ethics support staff