Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Does the General Medical Council’s 2020 guidance on consent advance on its 2008 guidance?
- Correspondence to Dr Abeezar I Sarela, Department of Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; a.sarela{at}leeds.ac.uk
Citation
Does the General Medical Council’s 2020 guidance on consent advance on its 2008 guidance?
Publication history
- Received February 18, 2021
- Accepted August 1, 2021
- First published August 23, 2021.
Online issue publication
May 19, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (28 November 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The Supreme Court’s decision in McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board: Does it condone healthcare injustice?
- Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board
- Update on the UK law on consent
- ‘Bolam’ to ‘Montgomery’ is result of evolutionary change of medical practice towards ‘patient-centred care’
- Consent in the time of COVID-19
- Montgomery on informed consent: an inexpert decision?
- Montgomery, informed consent and causation of harm: lessons from Australia or a uniquely English approach to patient autonomy?
- Challenge of achieving truly individualised informed consent in therapeutic endoscopy
- How to communicate evidence to patients
- How should surgeons obtain consent during the covid-19 pandemic?