Article Text
Abstract
Cancer registries are an important part of the public health infrastructure, since they allow to monitor the temporal trends of this illness as well as facilitate epidemiological research. In order to effectively set up such registries, it is necessary to create a system of data collection that permits to record health-related information from patients who are diagnosed with cancer. Given the sensitive nature of such data, it is debated whether their recording should be based on consent or whether alternative arrangements are possible (eg, opt-out systems where information is automatically collected but patients can later withdraw). In the recent reform of the Swiss cancer registration legislation, the lawmaker set out to implement rules about the recording of data in cancer registries that would allegedly go beyond a consent-based model, in order to balance accurate registration with respect of patient rights. However, by analysing the operational norms of the new legislation and comparing them with those of other systems, it emerges that the Swiss rules de facto closely resemble a system of registration based on informed consent—in partial contradiction with the objective pursued by the lawmaker. In this paper, we show how the details of a policy are crucial to determine its true nature and we highlight some critical elements—from an ethical standpoint—of the recently reformed Swiss policy on cancer registration.
- confidentiality/privacy
- informed consent
- law
- population policy
- public health ethics
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. No datasets were generated or used to write this article.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Protecting patient privacy in digital health technology: the Dutch m-Health infrastructure of Hartwacht as a learning case
- Life and bladder cancer: protocol for a longitudinal and cross-sectional patient-reported outcomes study of Yorkshire (UK) patients
- 'It’s not something you can take in your hands'. Swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study
- Navigating data governance associated with real-world data for public benefit: an overview in the UK and future considerations
- Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations
- Cohort profile: prescriptions dispensed in the community linked to the national cancer registry in England
- Role of empathy in the outcomes of colorectal cancer: protocol for a population-based study in two areas in France (EMPACOL Project)
- Rebooting consent in the digital age: a governance framework for health data exchange
- How data protection changes will affect your practice
- Background and current data protection legislation