Article info
Original research
Ethical impact of suboptimal referrals on delivery of care in radiology department
- Correspondence to Catherine Chilute Chilanga, Health and Social Sciences- Department of Optometry, Radiography and Lighting Design, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg 3679, Norway; catherine.chilanga{at}usn.no
Citation
Ethical impact of suboptimal referrals on delivery of care in radiology department
Publication history
- Received February 17, 2021
- Accepted July 30, 2021
- First published August 24, 2021.
Online issue publication
November 28, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (24 August 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Principlist approach to multiple heart valve replacements for patients with intravenous drug use-induced endocarditis
- The ethical dilemma of emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain
- An emergency department intervention to protect an overlooked group of children at risk of significant harm
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- Challenge studies of human volunteers: ethical issues
- Work conditions, mental workload and patient care quality: a multisource study in the emergency department
- Health incentive research and social justice: does the risk of long term harms to systematically disadvantaged groups bear consideration?
- How well informed are patients when leaving the emergency department? comparing information provided and information retained
- Informed consent in neurosurgery—translating ethical theory into action
- What does it mean for a clinical AI to be just: conflicts between local fairness and being fit-for-purpose?