In current Western societies, increasing numbers of people express their desire to choose when to die. Allowing people to choose the moment of their death is an ethical issue that should be embedded in sound clinical and legal frameworks. In the case of persons with dementia, it raises further ethical questions such as: Does the person have the capacity to make the choice? Is the person being coerced? Who should be involved in the decision? Is the person’s suffering untreatable? The use of Advance Euthanasia Directives (AED) is suggested as a way to deal with end-of-life wishes of persons with dementia. However, in the Netherlands—the only country in which this practice is legal—the experiences of patients, doctors, and relatives have been far from satisfactory.
Our paper analyses this complex ethical challenge from a Dignity-Enhancing Care approach, starting from the Dutch experiences with AED as a case. We first consider the lived experiences of the different stakeholders, seeking out a dialogical-interpretative understanding of care. We aim to promote human dignity as a normative standard for end-of-life care practices. Three concrete proposals are then presented in which this approach can be operationalised in order to deal respectfully with the end-of-life choices of persons with dementia.
- palliative care
- living wills/advance directives
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors Both authors contributed equally to the drafting of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?
- Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications
- The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision-making in dementia
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- AEDs are problematic, but Mrs A is a misleading case
- Is this person with dementia (currently) competent to request euthanasia? A complicated and underexplored question
- Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living?
- Response to: ‘Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns’ by Jongsma et al
- Do guidelines on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Dutch hospitals and nursing homes reflect the law? A content analysis
- Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns