Article info
PDFCommentary
Genetic exceptionalism, revisionism, pluralism and convergence in the ethics of insurance: response to commentators
- Correspondence to Dr Jonathan Pugh, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK; jonathan.pugh{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Genetic exceptionalism, revisionism, pluralism and convergence in the ethics of insurance: response to commentators
Publication history
- Received January 14, 2022
- Accepted January 30, 2022
- First published February 19, 2022.
Online issue publication
October 31, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 February 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals’ views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium
- Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: a human rights issue
- Social insurance, mutualistic insurance and genetic information
- Genetic information, social justice, and risk-sharing institutions
- Ethical issues in predictive genetic testing: a public health perspective
- 53 GENETIC DISCRIMINATION BY INSURERS AS A RESULT OF GENETIC RESEARCH AND TESTING: A COMPARISON OF NATIONAL POLICIES
- The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices
- Genomic privacy, identity and dignity