Article info
PDFFeature article
Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement
- Correspondence to Mr Niek Kok, Radboudumc, Nijmegen 6525 GA, The Netherlands; Niek.kok{at}radboudumc.nl
Citation
Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement
Publication history
- Received October 19, 2021
- Accepted May 7, 2022
- First published May 18, 2022.
Online issue publication
January 18, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 January 2024).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation
- Materialising and fostering organisational morisprudence through ethics support tools
- Measuring the impact of clinical ethics support services: further points for consideration
- Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals’ priorities
- Training healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators: evaluation of a Dutch training programme
- Towards organisational quality in ethics through patterns and process
- Relevance of a normative framework for evaluating the impact of clinical ethics support services in healthcare
- Moral case deliberation
- Culture, normativity and morisprudence: a response to the commentaries
- It’s still about ethics, isn’t it?