Article Text
Abstract
Decreasing unintended teenage pregnancy, especially repeat teenage pregnancy, is an important public health goal. Unfortunately, legal barriers in the USA impede this goal as all minors are unable to consent for birth control in 24 states, and only 10 of those states allow consent after the minor has given birth according to state statutory law. Placement of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is one of the most effective methods of preventing rapid repeat pregnancies. However, restrictions are placed on adolescents who may not have the option of parental consent if the parents are unwilling, or not present, to give consent. A predicament arises when healthcare professionals are willing to place the contraceptive for the patient, but cannot due to the restrictions and guidelines outlined by each state. Even though these adolescents are legally viewed as minors, adolescent mothers should be able to consent to the placement of LARC. Notably, adolescents have the legal ability to give consent for the healthcare of their child starting in the prenatal period. I argue that this ability should be extended to include adolescent consent for their own healthcare. Additionally, the procedure to place LARC is relatively low risk and highly effective, which is an opportune situation to allow minors to consent. Allowing adolescents to consent to LARC after delivery is a simple and effective way to decrease rapid repeat pregnancy rates in the USA.
- decision-making
- availability of contraceptives to minors
- ethics
- minors/parental consent
- obstetrics and gynaecology
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- decision-making
- availability of contraceptives to minors
- ethics
- minors/parental consent
- obstetrics and gynaecology
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article.
Footnotes
Contributors SK is the sole author and performed the research and writing of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Immediate postnatal contraception: what women know and think
- Paid protection? Ethics of incentivised long-acting reversible contraception in adolescents with alcohol and other drug use
- Continuous quality improvement strategy for increasing immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive use at Jimma University Medical Center, Jimma, Ethiopia
- Consenting to invasive contraceptives: an ethical analysis of adolescent decision-making authority for long-acting reversible contraception
- Women’s and healthcare professionals’ views on immediate postnatal contraception provision: a literature review
- Centering contraception: postpartum contraceptive choices of women enrolled in Centering group prenatal care versus traditional prenatal care
- Post-abortion initiation of long-acting reversible contraception in New Zealand
- The ethics of state-sponsored and clinical promotion of long-acting reversible contraception
- Understanding barriers to using long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
- Long-acting reversible contraception and satisfaction with structured contraceptive counselling among non-migrant, foreign-born migrant and second-generation migrant women: evidence from a cluster randomised controlled trial (the LOWE trial) in Sweden