Citation Tools
PDFEditorial
Pragmatic argument for an acceptance-refusal asymmetry in competence requirements
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Pragmatic argument for an acceptance-refusal asymmetry in competence requirements
Other content recommended for you
- Can we learn from hidden mistakes? Self-fulfilling prophecy and responsible neuroprognostic innovation
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies
- Troponin I, laboratory issues, and clinical outcomes in a district general hospital: crossover study with “traditional” markers of myocardial infarction in a total of 1990 patients
- Guidance for the design and reporting of studies evaluating the clinical performance of tests for present or past SARS-CoV-2 infection
- Sense and sensitivity: can an inaccurate test be better than no test at all?
- Association between guideline adherence and clinical outcome for patients referred for diagnostic breast imaging
- Estimating misclassification error in a binary performance indicator: case study of low value care in Australian hospitals
- Exploring the impact of pulse oximeter selection within the COVID-19 home-use pulse oximetry pathways
- Competence for physician-assisted death of patients with mental disorders: theoretical and practical considerations
- AI, doping and ethics: On why increasing the effectiveness of detecting doping fraud in sport may be morally wrong