Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust - Cass Review and potential further legal action
In previous Ethics briefings 1 we have highlighted the developments in the case of Bell & Another v the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust. The case concerned a judicial review of the practice of prescribing puberty blocking treatment to children and young people at the Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) managed by the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (the Trust). The Court of Appeal in its judgement2 found the Trust’s practices to be lawful, and overturned previous guidance given by the High Court which had contradicted the 'Gillick principle' regarding whether a child or young person could consent to medical treatment, without the consent of its parent.
Despite this legal success, concerns over the GIDS continued. In September, NHS England commissioned an independent and wide-ranging review of gender identity services for children and young people led by Dr Hilary Cass, past president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Dr Cass’s Interim review, published in March,3 has resulted in a decision by NHS England to close the GIDS at the Trust by Spring 2023, and replace it with regional centres at existing children’s hospitals offering more 'holistic care' with ’strong links to mental health services’. It is proposed that regional centres will be established at Great Ormond Street Hospital, and Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust.
Dr Cass was critical of the clinic’s failure to collect sufficient data on the impact of puberty blockers in under-16s. …
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Tavistock to face possible clinical negligence claims over gender identity service
- Gender dysphoria service rated inadequate after waiting list of 4600 raises concerns
- Gender dysphoria in children: puberty blockers study draws further criticism
- High court should not restrict access to puberty blockers for minors
- Gender identity services in the UK are on pause as evidence comes under scrutiny
- Services for children with gender dysphoria need fundamental reform, says interim review
- Puberty blockers: children under 16 should not be referred without court order, says NHS England
- Puberty blockers do not alleviate negative thoughts in children with gender dysphoria, finds study
- Doctors can decide if children are able to consent to puberty blockers, say judges
- Ethics briefing