Article info
Extended essay
Lord Sumption and the values of life, liberty and security: before and since the COVID-19 outbreak
- Correspondence to Professor John Coggon, Centre for Health, Law, and Society, University of Bristol Law School, Bristol, BS8 1HH, UK; john.coggon{at}bristol.ac.uk
Citation
Lord Sumption and the values of life, liberty and security: before and since the COVID-19 outbreak
Publication history
- Received February 15, 2021
- Accepted May 19, 2021
- First published July 12, 2021.
Online issue publication
September 28, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (12 July 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- A matter of life and death
- Ethics briefings
- The place for individual conscience
- Who gets the ventilator? Important legal rights in a pandemic
- Emotional impact on healthcare providers involved in medical assistance in dying (MAiD): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
- Ethical problems in respiratory care: the role of the law
- Medical Assistance in Dying at a paediatric hospital
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Procedure, practice and legal requirements: a commentary on ‘Why I wrote my advance decision’
- Discrimination against the dying