Article info
PDFOriginal research
Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- Correspondence to Dr Michael Robinson, Philosophy Department, Chapman University, Orange, California, USA; michaelrobinson{at}chapman.edu
Citation
Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
Publication history
- Received May 7, 2021
- Accepted May 22, 2021
- First published July 13, 2021.
Online issue publication
September 28, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (28 September 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- When should conscientious objection be accepted?
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: new directions
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen