Article Text
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for clinical ethics support provision to ensure as far as possible fair decision making and to address healthcare workers’ moral distress.
Purpose To describe the availability, characteristics and role of clinical ethics support services (CESSs) in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Method A descriptive cross-sectional online survey was developed by the research team. The survey included questions on CESSs characteristics (model, types of support, guidance development, membership, parent and patient involvement) and changes in response to the pandemic. Invitations to participate were widely circulated via National Health Service institutional emails and relevant clinical ethics groups known to the research team.
Results Between October 2020 and June 2021, a total of 53 responses were received. In response to the pandemic, new CESSs were established, and existing provision changed. Most took the form of clinical ethics committees, groups and advisory boards, which varied in size and membership and the body of clinicians and patient populations they served. Some services provided moral distress support and educational provision for clinical staff. During the pandemic, services became more responsive to clinicians’ requests for ethics support and advice. More than half of respondents developed local guidance and around three quarters formed links with regional or other local services. Patient and/or family members’ involvement in ethics discussions is infrequent.
Conclusions The pandemic has resulted in an expansion in the number of CESSs. Though some may disband as the pandemic eases, the reliance on CESSs during the pandemic demonstrates the need for additional research to better understand the effectiveness of their various forms, connections, guidance, services and modes of working and for better support to enhance consistency, transparency, communication with patients and availability to clinical staff.
- COVID-19
- ethics committees
- ethics- medical
- ethics
Data availability statement
Data are available on reasonable request. Data are available upon reasonable request.
This article is made freely available for personal use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.
https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usageStatistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data are available on reasonable request. Data are available upon reasonable request.
Footnotes
Twitter @profEmmaCave
Contributors MD designed the survey in conjunction with DA and EC. MD drafted the results, and DA and EC drafted the discussion. All authors finalised and approved the submission. MD is responsible for the overall content as guarantor.
Funding The authors acknowledge the support of the British Academy, grant number COV19\200446 for their project ‘Ethical advice and ethics committees in the pandemic’ June 2020-July 2021.
Competing interests DA and MD are members of the GOSH Paediatric Bioethics Centre.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Work of a paediatric bioethics centre during the COVID-19 pandemic first phase
- Challenging misconceptions about clinical ethics support during COVID-19 and beyond: a legal update and future considerations
- Development of clinical ethics committees
- Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK
- Ethical road map through the covid-19 pandemic
- Ethical advice in paediatric care
- Ethics support in clinical practice
- Clinic, courtroom or (specialist) committee: in the best interests of the critically Ill child?
- Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: a national survey
- Consultation activities of clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom: an empirical study and wake-up call