Article info
PDFStudent essay
High court should not restrict access to puberty blockers for minors
- Correspondence to Cameron Beattie, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; cameron.beattie{at}stcatz.ox.ac.uk
Citation
High court should not restrict access to puberty blockers for minors
Publication history
- Received November 4, 2020
- Revised January 9, 2021
- Accepted January 15, 2021
- First published February 16, 2021.
Online issue publication
December 22, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 February 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Two dilemmas for medical ethics in the treatment of gender dysphoria in youth
- Forever young? The ethics of ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults
- Services for children with gender dysphoria need fundamental reform, says interim review
- Tavistock to face possible clinical negligence claims over gender identity service
- Gender dysphoria in children: puberty blockers study draws further criticism
- Puberty blocking in gender dysphoria: suitable for all?
- Puberty blockers do not alleviate negative thoughts in children with gender dysphoria, finds study
- Longitudinal Outcomes of Gender Identity in Children (LOGIC): protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of children referred to the UK gender identity development service
- Assessment and support of children and adolescents with gender dysphoria
- Gender dysphoria in adolescents: can adolescents or parents give valid consent to puberty blockers?