Article Text
Commentary
Ethics of telepsychiatry versus face-to-face treatment: let the patients make their autonomous choice
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- ‘Can you hear me?’: communication, relationship and ethics in video-based telepsychiatric consultations
- Telemental health for clinical assessment and treatment
- Telephone-based telepsychiatry consultations: a qualitative exploration of psychiatrists’ experiences in Oman
- Evaluation of telepsychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic across service users, carers and clinicians: an international mixed-methods study
- Mind the gap please: ethical considerations in the transition of virtual consultations from crisis to usual care
- Facilitators of and barriers to perinatal telepsychiatry care: a qualitative study
- Striving for autonomy in everyday diabetes self-management—qualitative exploration via grounded theory approach
- In the room when it happens
- Mental health specialist video consultations for patients with depression or anxiety disorders in primary care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial
- Psychiatric treatment conducted via telemedicine versus in-person consultations in mood, anxiety and personality disorders: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis