Article info
PDFConcise argument
The concise argument – choice, choices and the choice agenda
- Correspondence to Dr Lucy Frith, Centre for Social Ethics & Policy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; lucy.frith{at}manchester.ac.uk
Citation
The concise argument – choice, choices and the choice agenda
Publication history
- First published December 22, 2021.
Online issue publication
December 22, 2021
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Value of choice
- High court should not restrict access to puberty blockers for minors
- Mature minors and gender dysphoria: a matter for clinicians not courts
- Values for victims and vectors of disease
- The concise argument: the importance of consent and choice
- Two dilemmas for medical ethics in the treatment of gender dysphoria in youth
- Forever young? The ethics of ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults
- Gender dysphoria in children: puberty blockers study draws further criticism
- Ethics briefing
- Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents