Article info
Response
Emotional support animals are not like prosthetics: a response to Sara Kolmes
- Correspondence to Jessica du Toit, Philosophy, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; jess.dutoit{at}gmail.com
Citation
Emotional support animals are not like prosthetics: a response to Sara Kolmes
Publication history
- Received September 14, 2020
- Revised September 30, 2020
- Accepted October 2, 2020
- First published November 4, 2020.
Online issue publication
August 23, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (4 November 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Are emotional support animals prosthetics or pets? Body-like rights to emotional support animals
- When pigs fly: emotional support animals, service dogs and the politics of legitimacy across species boundaries
- Words
- Being well together? Promoting health and well-being through more than human collaboration and companionship
- Parroting patriots: interspecies trauma and becoming-well-together
- Prosthesis and the engineered imagination: reading augmentation and disability across cultural theory, representation and product design
- Virtual volunteers: the importance of restructuring medical volunteering during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Clinical management of quadriplegia in low and middle-income countries: a patient’s road to physiotherapy, prostheses and rehabilitation
- The Paralympic effect on amputees’ legal claims for prosthetics
- ‘Limbitless Solutions’: the Prosthetic Arm, Iron Man and the Science Fiction of Technoscience