Article Text
Commentary
Justifiable discrimination? on Cameron et al’s proportionality test
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors The author contributed to the conception, analysis, drafting and revising of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics of selective restriction of liberty in a pandemic
- Health and human rights are inextricably linked in the COVID-19 response
- Building a multisystemic understanding of societal resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic
- Lockdown, public good and equality during COVID-19
- The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good
- Mental health condition of college students compared to non-students during COVID-19 lockdown: the CONFINS study
- Protecting privacy in mandatory reporting of infectious diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives from a developing country
- Passport to freedom? Immunity passports for COVID-19
- The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities
- Lockdown and levelling down: why Savulescu and Cameron are mistaken about selective isolation of the elderly