Article Text
Response
Response to our reviewers
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Both authors contributed equally, provided critical intellectual input and revisions, and read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI
- Randomised controlled trials in medical AI: ethical considerations
- Public perceptions on the application of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis
- Design publicity of black box algorithms: a support to the epistemic and ethical justifications of medical AI systems
- Trust does not need to be human: it is possible to trust medical AI
- Limits of trust in medical AI
- Does “AI” stand for augmenting inequality in the era of covid-19 healthcare?
- Developing, implementing and governing artificial intelligence in medicine: a step-by-step approach to prevent an artificial intelligence winter
- Trustworthy medical AI systems need to know when they don’t know
- Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI