Article info
PDFCommentary
Genetic information, social justice, and risk-sharing institutions
- Correspondence to Dr Martin O'Neill, Department of Philosophy, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK; martin.oneill{at}york.ac.uk
Citation
Genetic information, social justice, and risk-sharing institutions
Publication history
- Received May 26, 2021
- Accepted June 1, 2021
- First published June 21, 2021.
Online issue publication
June 24, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (24 June 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- Genetic exceptionalism, revisionism, pluralism and convergence in the ethics of insurance: response to commentators
- Social insurance, mutualistic insurance and genetic information
- Should genetic information be disclosed to insurers? No
- Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics
- How do policymakers interpret and implement the principle of equivalence with regard to prison health? A qualitative study among key policymakers in England
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: a human rights issue
- Genetics and public health—evolution, or revolution?
- Relevance and limits of the principle of “equivalence of care” in prison medicine
- ‘Equivalence of care’ in prison medicine: is equivalence of process the right measure of equity?