Article Text
Commentary
Genetic information, social justice, and risk-sharing institutions
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @martin_oneill
Contributors MO is the sole author of the article.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- Genetic exceptionalism, revisionism, pluralism and convergence in the ethics of insurance: response to commentators
- Social insurance, mutualistic insurance and genetic information
- Should genetic information be disclosed to insurers? No
- Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics
- How do policymakers interpret and implement the principle of equivalence with regard to prison health? A qualitative study among key policymakers in England
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: a human rights issue
- Genetics and public health—evolution, or revolution?
- Relevance and limits of the principle of “equivalence of care” in prison medicine
- ‘Equivalence of care’ in prison medicine: is equivalence of process the right measure of equity?