Article Text
Commentary
Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Single authored.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- Genetic exceptionalism, revisionism, pluralism and convergence in the ethics of insurance: response to commentators
- A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals’ views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium
- Is genetic information relevantly different from other kinds of non-genetic information in the life insurance context?
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: a human rights issue
- 53 GENETIC DISCRIMINATION BY INSURERS AS A RESULT OF GENETIC RESEARCH AND TESTING: A COMPARISON OF NATIONAL POLICIES
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: empirical evidence from a cross sectional survey of genetic support groups in the United Kingdom
- Getting insurance after genetic screening on familial hypercholesterolaemia; the need to educate both insurers and the public to increase adherence to national guidelines in the Netherlands
- Ethics briefings
- UK insurers agree five year ban on using genetic tests