Article info
Feature article
Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- Correspondence to Dr Jonathan Pugh, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK; jonathan.pugh{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
Publication history
- Received September 16, 2020
- Revised March 6, 2021
- Accepted March 20, 2021
- First published April 15, 2021.
Online issue publication
June 24, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 April 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic exceptionalism, revisionism, pluralism and convergence in the ethics of insurance: response to commentators
- Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics
- A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals’ views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: a human rights issue
- Genetic information, social justice, and risk-sharing institutions
- Distributive justice and the harm to medical professionals fighting epidemics
- A framework for luck egalitarianism in health and healthcare
- Research for Health Justice: an ethical framework linking global health research to health equity
- Principles of justice in health care rationing
- Is genetic information relevantly different from other kinds of non-genetic information in the life insurance context?