Article info
PDFResponse
How to obtain informed consent for psychotherapy: a reply to criticism
- Correspondence to Dr Garson Leder, Alden March Bioethics Institute, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA; leder.garson{at}gmail.com
Citation
How to obtain informed consent for psychotherapy: a reply to criticism
Publication history
- Received December 3, 2020
- Accepted December 10, 2020
- First published January 17, 2021.
Online issue publication
June 24, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (17 January 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Psychotherapy, placebos, and informed consent
- Psychotherapy is still failing patients: revisiting informed consent — a response to Garson Leder
- Talking more about talking cures: cognitive behavioural therapy and informed consent
- Disclosure of incidental constituents of psychotherapy as a moral obligation for psychiatrists and psychotherapists
- STEP. De study — a multicentre cluster - randomised effectiveness trial of exercise therapy for patients with depressive symptoms in healthcare services: study protocol
- The impossibility of informed consent
- Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy augmentation in major depression treatment (ECAM study): study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
- Effectiveness of a web - based decision aid for patients with generalised anxiety disorder: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?
- Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis