Article info
PDFConcise argument
Open therapy and its enemies
- Correspondence to Dr Jesse Wall, Faculty of Law, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; jesse.wall{at}auckland.ac.nz
Citation
Open therapy and its enemies
Publication history
- First published June 24, 2021.
Online issue publication
June 24, 2021
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Psychotherapy, placebos, and informed consent
- Psychotherapy is still failing patients: revisiting informed consent—a response to Garson Leder
- Talking more about talking cures: cognitive behavioural therapy and informed consent
- How to obtain informed consent for psychotherapy: a reply to criticism
- Cost and outcome of behavioural activation versus cognitive behavioural therapy for depression (COBRA): a qualitative process evaluation
- Preferences for group arts therapies: a cross-sectional survey of mental health patients and the general population
- Moving from tradition-based to competence-based psychotherapy
- Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy experiences in youth with inflammatory bowel disease and depression: findings from a mixed methods qualitative study
- Mediators and theories of change in psychotherapy with adolescents: a systematic review protocol
- Ethics of telepsychiatry versus face-to-face treatment: let the patients make their autonomous choice