Article info
PDFConcise argument
Open therapy and its enemies
- Correspondence to Dr Jesse Wall, Faculty of Law, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; jesse.wall{at}auckland.ac.nz
Citation
Open therapy and its enemies
Publication history
- First published June 24, 2021.
Online issue publication
June 24, 2021
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Psychotherapy, placebos, and informed consent
- Psychotherapy is still failing patients: revisiting informed consent — a response to Garson Leder
- Regional differences in chlamydia and gonorrhoeae positivity rate among heterosexual STI clinic visitors in the Netherlands: contribution of client and regional characteristics as assessed by cross-sectional surveillance data
- Client - level predictors of treatment engagement, outcome and dropout: moving beyond demographics
- Talking more about talking cures: cognitive behavioural therapy and informed consent
- What makes for an effective stop - smoking service
- Psychotherapy for mental health symptoms and disorders in elite athletes: a narrative review
- Progress in voluntary medical male circumcision for HIV prevention supported by the US President ’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through 2017: longitudinal and recent cross-sectional programme data
- Postpartum family planning integration with maternal, newborn and child health services: a cross-sectional analysis of client flow patterns in India and Kenya
- Moving from tradition - based to competence - based psychotherapy