Orphans and the relational significance of birth: a response to Singh
Prabhpal Singh has defended a relational account of the difference in moral status between fetuses and newborns. Newborns stand in the parent-child relation while fetuses do not, and standing in the parent-child relationship brings with it higher moral status for newborns. Orphans pose a problem for this account because they do not stand in a parent-child relationship. I argue that Singh has not satisfactorily responded to the problem.
- Moral Status
- Newborns and Minors
- Embryos and Fetuses
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Parental responsibilities and moral status
- Defending the distinction between pregnancy and parenthood
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Orphans cannot be after-birth aborted: a response to Bobier
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Subjects of ectogenesis: are ‘gestatelings’ fetuses, newborns or neither?
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva