Article info
PDFExtended essay
Potential for epistemic injustice in evidence-based healthcare policy and guidance
- Correspondence to Professor Jonathan Anthony Michaels, Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield School of Health and Related Research, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK; j.michaels{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Citation
Potential for epistemic injustice in evidence-based healthcare policy and guidance
Publication history
- Received February 28, 2020
- Revised April 12, 2020
- Accepted May 11, 2020
- First published May 27, 2020.
Online issue publication
May 21, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 May 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Value assessment frameworks: who is valuing the care in healthcare?
- Epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters: evidence from chronic fatigue syndrome
- Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness
- Not a NICE fallacy: a reply to Dr Quigley
- Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach
- NICE rapid guidelines: exploring political influence on guidelines
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments
- Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics
- Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice
- Making space for disability studies within a structurally competent medical curriculum: reflections on long Covid