Article info
PDFCommentary
Near-term ethical challenges of digital twins
- Correspondence to Dr Brent Mittelstadt, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3JS, UK; brent.mittelstadt{at}oii.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Near-term ethical challenges of digital twins
Publication history
- Received April 23, 2021
- Accepted April 25, 2021
- First published May 7, 2021.
Online issue publication
June 21, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (21 June 2021).
- Previous version (21 June 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Represent me: please! Towards an ethics of digital twins in medicine
- Perspectives on digital twins and the (im)possibilities of control
- Language matters: the ‘digital twin’ metaphor in health and medicine
- Ethics of digital twins: four challenges
- ‘Represent me: please! Towards an ethics of digital twins in medicine’: Commentary
- Simulating (some) individuals in a connected world
- Should a medical digital twin be viewed as an extension of the patient's body?
- Digital twins running amok? Open questions for the ethics of an emerging medical technology
- Artificial intelligence across oncology specialties: current applications and emerging tools
- Present and future