Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Braun explores the use of digital twin technology in medicine with a particular emphasis on the question of how such simulations can represent a person.1 In defining some first conditions for ethically justifiable forms of representation of digital twins, he argues that digital twins do not threaten an embodied person, as long as that person retains control over their simulated representation via dynamic consent, and ideally with the option to choose both form and usage of the simulation.
His thoughtful elaboration provides insight into the challenges inherent in interactions between a person and their digital twin, emphasising the modes of control required to respect personal modes of freedom. This individual-centric approach to the question of representation leaves out the important ethical consideration of ensuring that all, not merely some, can be represented. Braun describes dynamic consent as a necessary mode of control, arguing that where a person is unable to give consent, ‘such simulations threaten to become illegitimate representations. They would then shift the kind of interaction from representation to illegitimate forms of prediction or surveillance and thereby could lead to infringements to individual modes of freedom.’ Consequently, the implementation of digital twin technology in healthcare would seem to exclude the most vulnerable members of society from participation in and benefiting from medical innovation, …
Contributors JK is the sole author.
Funding The author has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 724460).
Disclaimer The publication reflects only the author’s view, and the Funding Agency is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Represent me: please! Towards an ethics of digital twins in medicine
- Perspectives on digital twins and the (im)possibilities of control
- Ethics of digital twins: four challenges
- Digital twins running amok? Open questions for the ethics of an emerging medical technology
- ‘Represent me: please! Towards an ethics of digital twins in medicine’: Commentary
- Near-term ethical challenges of digital twins
- Language matters: the ‘digital twin’ metaphor in health and medicine
- Should a medical digital twin be viewed as an extension of the patient's body?
- Present and future
- 899 Estimating the impact of weight management treatments on childhood obesity in England