Article info
PDFCommentary
We might be afraid of black-box algorithms
- Correspondence to Dr Carissa Véliz, Hertford College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3BW, UK; carissa.veliz{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
We might be afraid of black-box algorithms
Publication history
- Received March 31, 2021
- Accepted March 31, 2021
- First published April 29, 2021.
Online issue publication
May 07, 2021
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI
- Design publicity of black box algorithms: a support to the epistemic and ethical justifications of medical AI systems
- Concerning a seemingly intractable feature of the accountability gap
- Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement: ethical and epistemological challenges of using AI in clinical diagnostic contexts
- Review of deep learning algorithms for the automatic detection of intracranial hemorrhages on computed tomography head imaging
- Triage, consent and trusting black boxes
- Response to our reviewers
- Transparent AI: reliabilist and proud
- (De)troubling transparency: artificial intelligence (AI) for clinical applications
- Evidence, ethics and the promise of artificial intelligence in psychiatry