Article info
Commentary
Concerning a seemingly intractable feature of the accountability gap
- Correspondence to Benjamin Lang, Bioethics, New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, NY 10039, USA; bhl7144{at}nyu.edu
Citation
Concerning a seemingly intractable feature of the accountability gap
Publication history
- Received March 22, 2021
- Accepted March 22, 2021
- First published April 7, 2021.
Online issue publication
April 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 April 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI
- We might be afraid of black-box algorithms
- Design publicity of black box algorithms: a support to the epistemic and ethical justifications of medical AI systems
- Response to our reviewers
- Triage, consent and trusting black boxes
- Evidence, ethics and the promise of artificial intelligence in psychiatry
- Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement: ethical and epistemological challenges of using AI in clinical diagnostic contexts
- Transparent AI: reliabilist and proud
- On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare
- Limits of trust in medical AI