Article info
Extended essay
Parental obligation and compelled caesarean section: careful analogies and reliable reasoning about individual cases
- Correspondence to Dr Elselijn Kingma, Philosophy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BF, UK; e.m.kingma{at}soton.ac.uk
Citation
Parental obligation and compelled caesarean section: careful analogies and reliable reasoning about individual cases
Publication history
- Received January 14, 2020
- Revised April 16, 2020
- Accepted April 25, 2020
- First published June 22, 2020.
Online issue publication
April 13, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 June 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Parental procreative obligation and the categorisation of disease: the case of cystic fibrosis
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Less nonsense upon stilts: the analysis of rights in medical ethics
- Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhood
- Homebirth and the Future Child
- A little bit pregnant: towards a pluralist account of non-sexual reproduction
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Moral status of the fetus and the permissibility of abortion: a contractarian response to Thomson’s violinist thought experiment
- Disclosure and consent: ensuring the ethical provision of information regarding childbirth