Article Text
PDFCommentary
Non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments: reply to Moen, Segers and Campo-Engelstein
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @EthicsThSoebirk
Contributors I am the sole author of the submitted article.
Funding This study was supported by Det Frie Forskningsråd (7013-00042).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Arguments on thin ice: on non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments
- Advancing technologies as both our saviour and our doom
- Individual solutions to social problems
- Disentangling the individualisation argument against non-medical egg freezing from feminist critiques
- Discussing social hierarchies and the importance of genetic ties: a commentary on Petersen
- Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion
- More than an idea: why ectogestation should become a concrete option
- Effectiveness of social egg freezing: protocol for systematic review and meta-analyses
- Beyond individualisation: towards a more contextualised understanding of women’s social egg freezing experiences
- Are conscientious objectors morally obligated to refer?