Article info
PDFResponse
Embracing slippery slope on physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia could have significant unintended consequences
- Correspondence to Zeljka Buturovic, Institute for Social Sciences, Belgrade 11000, Serbia; zbuturovic{at}idn.org.rs
Citation
Embracing slippery slope on physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia could have significant unintended consequences
Publication history
- Received January 22, 2020
- Revised March 13, 2020
- Accepted March 20, 2020
- First published March 27, 2020.
Online issue publication
April 13, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 March 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Medical assistance in dying for the psychiatrically ill reply to Buturovic
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Is the exclusion of psychiatric patients from access to physician-assisted suicide discriminatory?
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- Role of non-governmental organisations in physician assisted suicide
- Physician assisted suicide, euthanasia, or withdrawal of treatment
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- The Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court regarding assisted suicide: a template for pluralistic states?