In a recent article Joshua James Hatherley argues that, if physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is morally permissible for patients suffering from somatic illnesses, it should be permissible for psychiatric patients as well. He argues that psychiatric disorders do not necessarily impair decision-making ability, that they are not necessarily treatable and that legalising PAS for psychiatric patients would not diminish research and therapeutic interest in psychiatric treatments or impair their recovery through loss of hope. However, by erasing distinction between somatic and psychiatric disorders on those grounds, he also erases distinction between healthy adults and patients (whether somatic or psychiatric) essentially implying that PAS should be available to all, for all reasons or, ultimately no reason. Furthermore, as psychiatric patients are much more likely to be a source of usable organs for transplantation, their broad inclusion would strengthen the link between PAS/euthanasia and organ donation, potentially undermining both as well as diminishing already declining general trust in medical authorities and professionals and public health authorities and activists.
- suicide/assisted suicide
- public health ethics
- dead donor rule
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors The article is solely my own work.
Funding This study was funded by Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja (http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004564), grant no: 47010.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Medical assistance in dying for the psychiatrically ill reply to Buturovic
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Is the exclusion of psychiatric patients from access to physician-assisted suicide discriminatory?
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- Role of non-governmental organisations in physician assisted suicide
- Physician assisted suicide, euthanasia, or withdrawal of treatment
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- The Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court regarding assisted suicide: a template for pluralistic states?